<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Political Climate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://politicalclimate.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://politicalclimate.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Unfair and unbalanced, but true.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 17:27:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Balancing Act by A Siegel</title>
		<link>http://politicalclimate.wordpress.com/2009/04/14/balancing-act/#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator>A Siegel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 17:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalclimate.wordpress.com/?p=356#comment-82</guid>
		<description>Excellent discussion. Thank you.

Did you pick up that Toles did a cartoon and that Robinson criticized the Post on Rachel Maddow? (http://getenergysmartnow.com/2009/04/09/washington-posts-willfully-civil-war/)  FYI -- from same post, Eilperin made a mistake in her article for which I could imagine Will demanding.

Or that Mufson walked away from this and that there was a strong editorial basically backing up Eilperin?

Finally, have you picked up how bloggers correct their mistake (in trusting Will / The Post on something), while the Post doesn&#039;t seem ready to correct the slightest error?  http://getenergysmartnow.com/2009/04/09/mea-culpa-i-trusted-george-will-and-washington-post-fact-checking/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent discussion. Thank you.</p>
<p>Did you pick up that Toles did a cartoon and that Robinson criticized the Post on Rachel Maddow? (<a href="http://getenergysmartnow.com/2009/04/09/washington-posts-willfully-civil-war/" rel="nofollow">http://getenergysmartnow.com/2009/04/09/washington-posts-willfully-civil-war/</a>)  FYI &#8212; from same post, Eilperin made a mistake in her article for which I could imagine Will demanding.</p>
<p>Or that Mufson walked away from this and that there was a strong editorial basically backing up Eilperin?</p>
<p>Finally, have you picked up how bloggers correct their mistake (in trusting Will / The Post on something), while the Post doesn&#8217;t seem ready to correct the slightest error?  <a href="http://getenergysmartnow.com/2009/04/09/mea-culpa-i-trusted-george-will-and-washington-post-fact-checking/" rel="nofollow">http://getenergysmartnow.com/2009/04/09/mea-culpa-i-trusted-george-will-and-washington-post-fact-checking/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Balancing Act by The Cunctator</title>
		<link>http://politicalclimate.wordpress.com/2009/04/14/balancing-act/#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>The Cunctator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 15:24:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalclimate.wordpress.com/?p=356#comment-81</guid>
		<description>Jamie - can you email me? Thx.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jamie &#8211; can you email me? Thx.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Chilling Experience by Balancing Act &#171; The Political Climate</title>
		<link>http://politicalclimate.wordpress.com/2009/01/13/a-chilling-experience/#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>Balancing Act &#171; The Political Climate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 13:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalclimate.wordpress.com/?p=233#comment-80</guid>
		<description>[...] the beginning of the year, I set out to examine the interaction between the media and the uninformed American public here on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the beginning of the year, I set out to examine the interaction between the media and the uninformed American public here on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About Me by jdf15</title>
		<link>http://politicalclimate.wordpress.com/about/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>jdf15</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 02:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-75</guid>
		<description>just trying to make it look good...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just trying to make it look good&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About Me by greah</title>
		<link>http://politicalclimate.wordpress.com/about/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>greah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 02:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-74</guid>
		<description>sweet picture, thanks for cutting me out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sweet picture, thanks for cutting me out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Power Vacuum by jdf15</title>
		<link>http://politicalclimate.wordpress.com/2009/03/17/power-vacuum/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>jdf15</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 17:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalclimate.wordpress.com/?p=311#comment-73</guid>
		<description>This is an opinion column...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an opinion column&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Power Vacuum by dsasdf</title>
		<link>http://politicalclimate.wordpress.com/2009/03/17/power-vacuum/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>dsasdf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 14:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalclimate.wordpress.com/?p=311#comment-71</guid>
		<description>you&#039;re so unbiased.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you&#8217;re so unbiased.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on If you can&#8217;t beat them, silence them by Unfortunate Evolution &#171; The Political Climate</title>
		<link>http://politicalclimate.wordpress.com/2008/09/10/if-you-cant-beat-them-silence-them/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>Unfortunate Evolution &#171; The Political Climate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalclimate.wordpress.com/?p=31#comment-67</guid>
		<description>[...] Democrats.  As Stephen Colbert once said, “Reality has a well-known liberal bias” (video in this previous post).  So it is understandable that Republicans have not exactly championed our nation’s academic [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Democrats.  As Stephen Colbert once said, “Reality has a well-known liberal bias” (video in this previous post).  So it is understandable that Republicans have not exactly championed our nation’s academic [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Chilling Experience by Richad Mercer</title>
		<link>http://politicalclimate.wordpress.com/2009/01/13/a-chilling-experience/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>Richad Mercer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 05:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalclimate.wordpress.com/?p=233#comment-59</guid>
		<description>Peregrin
 
 I&#039;m not a degreed scientist, but I know you are shoveling horse dung.   The hockey stick debate is history.  You are way behind on the science.  I know that because I&#039;ve read many many rebuttals of the hockey stick argument by climate scientists.  It&#039;s hogwash.   

And the arctic sea ice hogwash was rebutted all over the internet by real climate scientists and even at the New York Times, not that the NYT is the better authority, but because when even they notice such twisting of the science, you know something is amiss.

Here&#039;s the science:

http://rabett.blogspot.com/2009/02/dive-dive-dive-arctic-sea-ice-cover-has.html



 for those less inclined to read
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9lVf8_6ziP8

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2nruCRcbnY0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peregrin</p>
<p> I&#8217;m not a degreed scientist, but I know you are shoveling horse dung.   The hockey stick debate is history.  You are way behind on the science.  I know that because I&#8217;ve read many many rebuttals of the hockey stick argument by climate scientists.  It&#8217;s hogwash.   </p>
<p>And the arctic sea ice hogwash was rebutted all over the internet by real climate scientists and even at the New York Times, not that the NYT is the better authority, but because when even they notice such twisting of the science, you know something is amiss.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the science:</p>
<p><a href="http://rabett.blogspot.com/2009/02/dive-dive-dive-arctic-sea-ice-cover-has.html" rel="nofollow">http://rabett.blogspot.com/2009/02/dive-dive-dive-arctic-sea-ice-cover-has.html</a></p>
<p> for those less inclined to read<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9lVf8_6ziP8" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9lVf8_6ziP8</a></p>
<p><span style="text-align:center; display: block;"><a href="http://politicalclimate.wordpress.com/2009/04/14/balancing-act/"><img src="http://img.youtube.com/vi/2nruCRcbnY0/2.jpg" alt="" /></a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Chilling Experience: Comment Response by greenfyre</title>
		<link>http://politicalclimate.wordpress.com/2009/01/13/a-chilling-experience-comment-reponse/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>greenfyre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 07:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalclimate.wordpress.com/?p=248#comment-42</guid>
		<description>Jamie

Thank you for the kind comment. Two things to note:

i) It&#039;s actually Michael Asher, not David
ii) Peter Sinclair has done a nice video debunking of Asher as well http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p0xqn_dG8ok

Mike aka greenfyre</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jamie</p>
<p>Thank you for the kind comment. Two things to note:</p>
<p>i) It&#8217;s actually Michael Asher, not David<br />
ii) Peter Sinclair has done a nice video debunking of Asher as well <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p0xqn_dG8ok" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p0xqn_dG8ok</a></p>
<p>Mike aka greenfyre</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
